The Quiet Things That Shape Us

Daily writing prompt
What book could you read over and over again?

There’s a certain kind of moment you don’t recognize until later—the quiet ones that change your direction without asking permission.

Mine came in a used bookstore.

The owner didn’t say much. He just walked up, placed Bad Haircut in my hands, and said, “Read this.”

No urgency. No explanation. Just certainty.

He’d mentioned Tom Perrotta before. I’d filed it away with all the other I’ll get to it authors. The list was long. He wasn’t near the top.

But something about that moment—something in the way the book didn’t feel optional—cut through the noise.

So I read it.

And somewhere between the first page and the last… something shifted.


What keeps pulling me back isn’t just the stories—it’s the people inside them.

Perrotta doesn’t build characters to serve a plot. He lets them exist first. And that changes everything.

He goes the extra mile in a way that doesn’t announce itself. There’s no dramatic spotlight, no forced moment telling you what matters. Instead, he works in the margins—the hesitation in a sentence, the wrong thing said at the wrong time, the silence that lingers just a second too long.

That’s where the truth lives.

His characters aren’t polished. They’re not particularly heroic. Half the time they don’t even understand themselves. But that’s exactly why they land.

They feel human.

Not the version we rehearse for other people—but the one that shows up when things don’t go the way we planned. Insecure. Conflicted. Trying. Failing. Trying again, sometimes worse than before.

And because of that, you don’t just read about them—you recognize them.

Worse… you recognize yourself.

That’s where the shift happens. That’s where you start to care.

Not because the story tells you to. But because you’ve seen that version of a person before. Maybe you’ve been that person. Maybe you still are.


There are a couple of moments in Bad Haircut that never really left me.

One of them is the way Perrotta describes the city—not as one place, but as two towns pretending to share the same space. There’s this invisible line. You cross it, and everything shifts. The tone. The people. The expectations.

No sign telling you it’s there. But you feel it.

That stuck with me because it’s real.

I grew up around cities like that. I’ve walked those lines without knowing what they were until I was already on the other side. Places where one block feels like possibility and the next feels like something closing in on you. Same city. Different rules.

Then there’s another moment—the one that hits a little closer.

The protagonist gets involved with an older woman while he’s still in high school. For him, it isn’t casual. It isn’t a story to tell his friends. It’s everything. The kind of moment that rewrites how you see yourself, how you think the world works.

And then she tells him she’s going to marry someone else.

Just like that.

It’s messy. Complicated. A little reckless. The kind of situation adults would label a mistake and move on from.

But for him, it’s not a footnote.

It’s a fracture.

That’s what Perrotta understands—something we tend to forget once we’ve put distance between who we were and who we are now.

Back then, everything mattered.

Every conversation carried weight. Every touch meant something. Every loss felt permanent.

There was no such thing as just a moment.

And when you read it now, older, supposedly wiser… you realize how much of that intensity never really left. It just learned how to hide better.


My all-time favorites are Count a Lonely Cadence by Gordon Weaver and Invisible Man by Ralph Ellison.

Those books move differently.

They carry weight in a more deliberate way—language that feels carved instead of spoken, themes that stretch beyond the page into something larger. Identity. Isolation. The cost of being seen—or not seen at all.

They demand something from you.

But Bad Haircut doesn’t move like that.

It doesn’t reach for myth. It doesn’t try to explain the world.

It stays smaller. Closer.

And somehow… that makes it hit just as hard.

Because where Weaver and Ellison deal in systems—power, institutions, identity under pressure—Perrotta works in something quieter.

He shows you how those same forces live in ordinary spaces. In school hallways. In neighborhoods. In the small decisions that don’t feel like decisions at all.

Not whether you survive a system…

But whether you become the kind of person who never questions it.

I return to these books because they recognize the life I’ve lived—even the parts I didn’t at the time.

Not the dramatic moments. Not the ones that make stories worth telling at a bar.

The quiet ones.

The ones that shape you before you even realize something is changing.


I’ve read other work by Tom Perrotta. Good work. Solid work.

But nothing hits me like Bad Haircut.

There’s something about it that doesn’t let go. Or maybe it never needed to—it just waited until I caught up to it.

It might even make my desert island list.

Count a Lonely Cadence.
Invisible Man.
And Bad Haircut.

Three different kinds of weight. Three different ways of telling the truth.

If you looked at those copies, you wouldn’t see pristine pages. You’d see wear. Creases in the spine. Edges softened from being opened too many times.

Dog-eared pages.

I hate dog-earing a book.

Always have.

But these?

These don’t feel like objects you preserve. They feel like something you return to—again and again—until the marks stop feeling like damage and start feeling like proof.

Proof that something in there wasn’t just worth reading—

It was worth needing.

Fold Theory & Fiction: Confessions of a Rereader

Daily writing prompt
What book could you read over and over again?

DAILY PROMPT RESPONSE

Plenty of books fall into this category. I’d love to say I have a strict system for what earns a reread, but let’s be honest: the rules shift every time. Sometimes it’s the writing, sometimes it’s a character who won’t shut up in my head, and other times it’s because the book whispered something suspicious from the shelf—like it knows things. Rereading isn’t a choice at that point. It’s a compulsion. Like the story implanted a post-hypnotic trigger in my brain that activates randomly. And when it does, I drop everything—sleep, obligations, dignity—and reread. Again.

Now, my particular brand of obsession comes with a twist: time travel. I don’t just read about it—I research it. Because yes, I’m building a time machine in my basement. And no, I’m not joking. I know what you’re thinking. This person is completely unhinged. Stop looking at me in that tone of voice. Don’t judge me—I’m backed by science.

Stephen Hawking once said, “Time travel used to be thought of as just science fiction, but Einstein’s theory of general relativity allows for the possibility that we could warp space-time so much that you could go off in a rocket and return before you set out.” So, technically, I’m not crazy—I’m just early.

And Einstein himself—our time-bending MVP—once said, “The distinction between past, present, and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion.” That quote haunts me. Because if time really is just an illusion, then maybe my late-night diagrams and basement scribbles aren’t completely absurd. Maybe I’m just trying to see through the illusion. With tools. And snacks.

Some books feel like accomplices in this mission. Einstein’s Dreams is one of them. It’s not a novel in the traditional sense—it’s more like a collection of speculative time experiments disguised as dreams. Time slows, speeds up, loops, fractures. Each version reveals how fragile we are, how much we lean on the idea that time is stable. It made me wonder if I want to manipulate time or if I just want to understand why it controls me so completely.

Then there’s The Psychology of Time Travel, which sounds quirky but plays out like a cautionary tale. It’s brilliant, and it doesn’t flinch. Time travel in that book isn’t just a shiny toy—it messes with identity, memory, and even reality. It shows the mental strain of knowing too much about your own timeline. Honestly, it made me stop mid-chapter and ask, Do I actually want to succeed at this, or do I just like the chase?

This is probably why I’ve started keeping my own book—a messy, ever-growing volume of experiments, part science, part psychology. Charts, notes, theories, emotional meltdowns—it’s all in there. It’s not publishable (yet), but it’s real. And it’s mine. Some people journal. I document the potential collapse of linear time. To each their own.

And then there’s the part no one wants to discuss—the mythic weight of time. The ancient beings who ruled it long before clocks or quantum theory. Chronos, the Greek god who devoured his children just to keep time moving in his favor. The Moirai, weaving destinies and snipping threads when they feel like it. Kāla, the Hindu personification of time, is both destroyer and renewer. Even the Norse Norns, sitting beneath the world tree, are casually deciding fates like it’s a hobby. These entities weren’t just metaphors—they were warnings. Time is power, and it doesn’t like to be tampered with.

The more I study, the more I feel like time isn’t linear—it’s layered. Some theorists say time can fold over itself like a sheet of paper, bringing two distant moments into contact. Others call it fluid, a river that bends, swells, evaporates, and returns in strange new forms. Honestly, I’ve felt both. There are days where the past bleeds into the present like ink on wet paper. There are moments I swear I’ve already lived. Maybe I’m stuck in a fold. Maybe I’m just bad at time management. Either way, I write it all down.¹

And Then She Vanished wasn’t just another trip down the wormhole—it rerouted my entire approach. The way it plays with memory, causality, and the emotional cost of screwing with time? It hit differently. I went in looking for narrative patterns, maybe a clever paradox or two. What I got was a punch to the gut and a blueprint for moral consequences. The book didn’t just mess with time—it made me rethink why I want to.

And maybe that’s the real loop. Because every time I pick up a pen, I feel it. Writing bends time, too. It stretches memory, warps emotion, and compresses decades into a sentence. Every time we write, are we building new worlds, or are we just reconstructing something we have already lived? Maybe stories are our version of time machines. Just paper ones. Slightly safer than the one in my basement.


¹ Excerpt from my “Working Theories of Time” notebook, vol. 3:

  • Time is a crumpled map, not a straight road. Folds = déjà vu. Rips = blackout years.
  • Fluid time isn’t just poetic—it leaks. Time gets messy around emotional events—breakups, funerals, weird Tuesdays.
  • The body remembers time differently than the mind. Proof: muscle memory, grief anniversaries, and spontaneous panic attacks for no logical reason.
  • Clocks lie. This isn’t a theory. Just a fact.

This is why I track time like a conspiracy theorist with a mood disorder. It’s all connected. Probably.

It’s a long list …

What book could you read over and over again?

Several books fall into this category. For me, the requirements to reread a book are simple, but they seem to evolve each time I read it. It’s almost like the book in question casts a spell on me, or a post-hypnotic suggestion is cleverly placed within the crevasses of my mind. Whereby I become the book’s slave, hopelessly doing its bidding. Despite the throws of my addiction, I’ve narrowed the list to only a few, but I’ll try to speak about one. Please be mindful that I did say try in case I fail at this endeavor.

So, the book I can and have read on multiple occasions is “The Green Mile” by Stephen King. This book isn’t the only book I have read multiple times and would read again without provocation, but it isn’t my favorite in this category. However, I have several reasons why I reread this book, but I will only list the main ones.

What draws me to The Green Mile is the idea this could actually happen. To me, King outdid himself in telling this story. Its structure and style is some of his best work. The themes tackled in this novel moved me. Some are subtle, while others slap you in the face. Lastly, I think this novel is just damn good. If I said I read this novel five times, it would be low.