What’s one thing you know now that would have saved your younger self a lot of pain?

View all responses

---

If I could tell my younger self one thing that might have spared him a considerable amount of pain, it would be this: Meet people where they are, not where you think they should be.

It sounds simple enough, doesn’t it? One of those little pieces of wisdom that people casually toss around, usually while explaining how someone else ought to live their life. The irony isn’t lost on me. I’ve spent a good portion of my own life learning that knowing something and understanding it are two entirely different matters. Experience has a rather unpleasant habit of making certain we appreciate the distinction. Sometimes the lessons are gentle reminders, little nudges that encourage us to reconsider our thinking. Other times, experience grabs us by the collar, drags us across the pavement, and leaves us wondering what the hell just happened.

Unfortunately, I’ve always been something of a hands-on learner.

I suppose my tendency to recognize trouble before it arrived began rather early. I remember being about eight years old, playing with a group of friends who had decided to explore a new area. I couldn’t tell you exactly what bothered me about the place, but something didn’t feel right. It wasn’t that I was particularly frightened. I simply had a bad feeling about what we were getting ready to do, and I made the unfortunate mistake of sharing that observation with my friends.

“You wimp!”

“Come on, guys. He’s just a coward!”

“Scaredy-pants!”

Naturally, everyone thought this was hilarious. There I stood, listening to a collection of eight-year-old experts explain the finer points of courage and cowardice. I’ll admit that I probably sounded a little wimpy, especially considering that I couldn’t offer a reasonable explanation for my reluctance. All I had was a feeling, and apparently, that wasn’t sufficient evidence to convince the distinguished panel of neighborhood idiots.

Still, I couldn’t shake it.

The first two went ahead without incident, which, of course, did absolutely nothing to improve my credibility. By then, I imagine my friends were feeling rather pleased with themselves. The third fellow wasn’t quite so fortunate.

There wasn’t any serious damage, thankfully, but there was definitely going to be some explaining to do when he got home. Personally, I think he might have preferred a broken bone. His mother was a formidable woman, and whatever discomfort he’d experienced during our little adventure was probably nothing compared to what awaited him when she discovered what he’d been doing.

I don’t remember taking any particular satisfaction in being right. What I remember is having a feeling that something wasn’t a good idea, expressing that concern, and discovering that nobody was particularly interested in hearing it.

Looking back, I recognize something about that experience that would take me considerably longer to understand. Sometimes people aren’t ready to hear what we have to say, regardless of how reasonable our concerns might be. And sometimes, the only thing we can do is allow them to discover what we already suspect.

Of course, at eight years old, I wasn’t contemplating the philosophical implications of respecting another person’s decisions. I was considerably more interested in avoiding whatever unpleasantness had befallen my unfortunate friend. Besides, there was a reasonable chance his mother would eventually discover that the rest of us had been involved, and I had no intention of volunteering that information.

Some lessons are best appreciated from a safe distance.

As I grew older, however, I developed the belief that helping someone meant doing everything within my power to improve their circumstances. If I recognized a problem and believed I understood the solution, it seemed perfectly reasonable to offer my assistance. After all, why would anyone willingly continue struggling when someone was standing nearby with a perfectly good solution? It made sense to me, which, looking back, was probably the first indication that I hadn’t considered the situation nearly as thoroughly as I believed.

What I failed to recognize was that my understanding of someone’s circumstances wasn’t necessarily their understanding. I was viewing their situation through the lens of my experiences, expectations, and personal beliefs. I could recognize what I considered mistakes, identify what appeared to be better alternatives, and imagine the person they might become if only they made a few different decisions.

There was just one small problem.

I wasn’t the person living their life.

That’s an uncomfortable realization, particularly when your intentions are genuinely good. We like to believe that caring about someone gives us insight into what they need. Sometimes it does. But insight isn’t authority, and concern doesn’t grant us ownership of another person’s decisions.

I’ve come to understand that much of the frustration we experience in our relationships comes from expectations that other people never agreed to meet. We develop an image of who someone should be, what they ought to understand, and how quickly they should recognize the things we believe are obvious. When they fail to meet those expectations, disappointment begins to creep into our thinking. Sometimes that disappointment becomes frustration, and occasionally, if we’re not careful, resentment.

What makes this particularly troublesome is that our intentions may be perfectly honorable. We aren’t necessarily trying to control anyone. We may genuinely believe we’re offering something valuable, perhaps even attempting to spare someone the pain of learning a lesson we’ve already endured. But somewhere between offering our assistance and waiting for it to be accepted, we begin attaching expectations to the outcome.

And that’s where things become complicated.

When someone rejects our advice, we sometimes interpret their decision as a rejection of us. After all, we’ve invested our experiences, judgment, and concern in what we’re offering. We know what it cost us to acquire that knowledge, and watching someone disregard it can be frustrating, particularly when we believe they’re heading toward circumstances that could have been avoided.

But their decision doesn’t diminish the value of our experience.

Nor does it obligate them to repeat our conclusions.

People arrive at understanding through different circumstances, and what seems painfully obvious to us may not be apparent to someone else. Sometimes they aren’t ready to hear what we have to say. Other times, they may understand perfectly well and simply disagree. We would do well to remember that those aren’t necessarily the same thing.

Perhaps the problem isn’t always their unwillingness to listen.

Perhaps the problem is our unwillingness to accept that they have the right to decide for themselves.

And perhaps the most difficult part of helping someone is learning when to stop explaining and simply remain available.

Of course, there’s a certain irony in all of this. Here I am, explaining the importance of meeting people where they are, while occasionally forgetting to follow my own advice. Apparently, knowing better doesn’t automatically translate into doing better. You would think that after all these years, I might have figured that out. But experience has taught me that wisdom requires maintenance, and some of us are considerably more expensive to maintain than others.

Walk the walk, and all that.

And then there’s my younger self. The fellow I’m supposedly trying to spare all this pain. I can only hope that when he reaches my age, he’ll have enough sense to listen to what I’m telling him now. Although, knowing him as I do, there’s a reasonable possibility he’ll ignore every word, stumble into precisely the circumstances I warned him about, and then act surprised when things go sideways.

Come to think of it, perhaps I should start by meeting him where he is.

After all, he’s only working with what he knows.

And so am I.

There’s a certain arrogance hidden within good intentions. Not necessarily the loud, obnoxious variety that announces itself whenever someone enters a room, but a quieter kind that convinces us our understanding of another person’s life is somehow more complete than their own. We mistake our concern for clarity and our experience for universal truth. Before long, we’re offering answers to questions nobody asked and becoming irritated when our wisdom isn’t received with the enthusiasm we believe it deserves.

I’ve been guilty of that.

More than once.

And while I would like to believe that age has cured me of the tendency, experience suggests otherwise. Apparently, recognizing our shortcomings doesn’t automatically prevent us from repeating them. Sometimes it simply means we’re considerably more aware of what we’re doing while we’re doing it.

Meeting people where they are doesn’t mean agreeing with where they are.

It doesn’t require us to abandon our principles, excuse harmful behavior, or pretend that every decision someone makes is equally wise. We can disagree with someone’s choices while respecting their right to make them. We can recognize destructive patterns without assuming responsibility for correcting them. And we can love someone deeply without making their progress a measure of our own success or failure.

There is a difference between offering someone a hand and attempting to drag them across the finish line.

I wish I’d understood that distinction much earlier.

I suspect it would have saved me countless hours of frustration, unnecessary arguments, and the emotional exhaustion that comes from trying to solve problems that were never entirely mine to solve. More importantly, it might have allowed me to appreciate people for who they were rather than becoming so preoccupied with who I believed they could become.

These days, I try to approach things differently.

When someone is struggling, I remind myself that my first responsibility isn’t necessarily to provide a solution. Sometimes it’s simply to listen. To acknowledge what they’re experiencing without immediately comparing it to something I’ve endured. To recognize that their circumstances may contain complications I cannot see, and that their hesitation may have reasons I don’t fully understand.

Sometimes people need advice. Sometimes they need practical assistance. Other times, they need the freedom to make their own mistakes without someone standing over their shoulder reminding them that they were warned.

And sometimes, they just need someone to show up.

That last part has become increasingly important to me.

We can help people when they’re ready to be helped. Until then, we can be present. We can offer encouragement without attaching conditions to it. We can make ourselves available without demanding that our presence produce a particular outcome. We can sit beside someone during difficult moments without feeling compelled to fill every silence with instructions.

I’ve also discovered that remaining available without interfering can require considerably more discipline than offering advice. There are moments when every instinct tells me to step forward, take charge, and straighten things out. Resisting that impulse isn’t always easy, particularly when someone I care about is struggling. But I’ve learned that my discomfort with their circumstances doesn’t necessarily justify my intervention.

Of course, there are limits.

I’ve had to recognize that compassion doesn’t require me to sacrifice my well-being or repeatedly expose myself to circumstances that cause harm. There have been times when maintaining a healthy distance was necessary, and others when I had to acknowledge that my continued involvement wasn’t helping anyone. Those decisions weren’t always comfortable, but neither was the realization that my desire to help could sometimes make an already difficult situation worse.

Showing up doesn’t mean surrendering ourselves.

It means understanding that our willingness to care and our ability to change someone’s circumstances are not the same thing.

Perhaps that’s the lesson I would most like my younger self to understand. Not that he should care less, become indifferent, or stop believing in the potential he recognizes in others. Those qualities have value, and I wouldn’t want him to lose them. But I would encourage him to recognize that potential isn’t a promise, and that another person’s journey doesn’t become his responsibility simply because he can imagine a different destination.

I would also remind him that the same consideration ought to extend to himself.

There were times when I expected more from myself than I was capable of giving. Times when I measured my progress against expectations that left little room for uncertainty, mistakes, or the simple reality of being human. Perhaps learning to meet other people where they are also requires us to recognize where we happen to be standing.

We are all works in progress, although some of us have accumulated considerably more construction debris than others.

Looking back, I cannot say with certainty that knowing these things would have prevented every painful experience. There’s a reasonable chance my younger self would have listened politely, nodded his head, and proceeded to do whatever foolish thing he had already decided to do. After all, I know the fellow rather well.

But perhaps he would have remembered something when the frustration began to build, when his good intentions were misunderstood, or when someone he cared about refused the assistance he believed they desperately needed.

Perhaps he would have understood that loving someone doesn’t mean directing their life.

Perhaps he would have learned that being present can matter more than being right.

And perhaps, instead of exhausting himself trying to move people toward places they weren’t ready to go, he would have learned to stand beside them, offer his hand, and allow them the dignity of deciding when to take it.

There’s something else I hope he would eventually understand. The patience and consideration he was learning to extend to others were things he deserved as well. He wasn’t going to have all the answers, and he certainly wasn’t going to get everything right. There would be mistakes, disappointments, and occasions when life would teach him lessons he would have preferred to learn under considerably less painful circumstances.

But he was doing the best he could with what he understood at the time.

And perhaps, after all these years, that’s something I need to remember about myself.

I cannot change the decisions that younger man made, nor can I spare him the experiences that shaped the person I’ve become. I can only look back with a little more understanding than I possessed when I was standing in his shoes.

Perhaps that’s what meeting people where they are ultimately requires of us. Not the certainty that we know what’s best for them, but the humility to recognize that we’re all finding our way through circumstances we don’t entirely understand.

And sometimes, the person who needs that understanding most is the one looking back at us from the mirror.

Meet people where they are, not where you think they should be.

Help them when they’re ready.

Until then, show up.

Sometimes, that’s enough.